Issue of the Week: Impacts Evaluation on Potential Northern Cascades Grizzly Restoration Underway

brownbear

Grizzly bears used to be found in remote, mountainous regions across western North America. Five known populations currently remain in the United States’ lower 48. Since the grizzly bear was listed as Endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act in 1975, only a few places have been designated “grizzly recovery areas,” such as the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem.  Washington State’s Northern Cascades have a small population of about 20 bears; however, it has never been designated as a “grizzly recovery area.”

But that may soon change. The National Park Service is now considering designating this area for bear recovery. An Environmental Impacts Statement (EIS) is being developed by the National Park Service to understand the potential impacts of expanding grizzly bear numbers in the Northern Cascades ecosystem. The EIS is a multi-stepped process that is required by the National Environmental Policy Act, and it should take three years to complete.

“The Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan calls on us to fully consider the restoration of the grizzly bear in the North Cascades,” said FWS Director Dan Ashe. “We will work together with the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, state of Washington, and the public as we move through the EIS process.”

While many are happy to finally see new conservation efforts in progress, others are a bit skeptical at raising the number of bears in the area. Grizzlies are large, impeccably fast creatures, with speeds reaching up to 30 miles an hour. They can be a danger to humans, especially if they surprise a mama bear with her cubs.

“Grizzly bears are incredible, wonderful animals,” said Tom Davis, Director of Government Relations for the Washington Farm Bureau. “I just wouldn’t want them living next door to me, and I think that’s how farmers and ranchers feel.”

Brown_Bear

The arguments for and against restoration will all be considered following a public comment period. FWS Director Dan Ashe ensures that the public will have an opportunity to voice their input before putting any plan into action. Still, there is no guarantee of action even after this process is finished. The EIS must consider all options, including the possibility of not restoring grizzlies to the area or a controversial option that involves taking healthy grizzlies and transporting them elsewhere.

Desire to conserve large, charismatic mega-fauna involves impassioned debates. Supporters believe that designating the Northern Cascades as a “grizzly recovery area” will help grizzly conservation and ensure that the surrounding wilderness encourages numbers to increase. This is especially attractive to restoration supporters who feel that the large, open wilderness of the Cascades is rapidly shrinking. However, some are concerned about the effects restoration will have on private landowners in the area and fear that target restoration numbers will be set higher than what society can tolerate. A similar problem occurred 20 years ago when restoration was first attempted for the area. It will be interesting to watch this potential program unfold as data from the EIS is recovered.

Twice a week, SCI Foundation informs readers about conservation initiatives happening worldwide and updates them on SCI Foundation’s news, projects and events. Tuesdays are dedicated to an Issue of the Week and Thursday’s Weekly Updates will provide an inside look into research and our other science-based conservation efforts. Follow us on Facebook and Twitter for more SCI Foundation news. 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s